Laserfiche WebLink
MN 1311,Section 301.1 makes provisions for three unique compliance paths. Adherence to any one of these three <br /> compliance paths satisfies the requirements of the code. <br /> 1311.301.1 "Prescriptive Methods" states that repairs, alterations or changes of occupancy complying with Chapter 4 of <br /> this(MN 1311) cbde shall be considered in compliance with the provisions of this code. Plumbing and fixture counts for <br /> plumbing are NOT ADDRESSED in Chapter 4, even when related to change of occupancy. Accessibility refers to the 2015 <br /> Minnesota Accessibility Code. <br /> 1311.301.2 "Work Area Compliance Method" includes Chapters 5 through 13 of 1311. Chapter 10 deals with change in <br /> occupancy, but the plumbing fixtures are only addressed when there is an increase or difference in plumbing fixture <br /> requirements (Section 1010.1). The proposed project has a decrease in demand. It is gray if the difference (decrease) <br /> in fixture count requirements could/should drive an increase in work scope, since a zero change in fixture count <br /> requirements would not trigger the change. But, if a change requirement is interpreted,then 1311.1010.1 refers to <br /> 4715 which refers back to 1305 in 4715.12.10. Convoluted but true. <br /> -similarly,Section 810.1 states that where there is an increase in plumbing fixture demand by more than 20%,then the <br /> plumbing fixtures shall be provided in accordance with 1305. Code is silent on reduction of loading. <br /> -Section 1012.1.4 states that all buildings undergoing a change of occupancy classification shall comply with Section <br /> 1012.8, which refers to the Minnesota Accessibility Code. <br /> 1311.301.3 "Performance Comqliance Method" refers to 1311, chapter 14. Section 1401.2.4 has the language that code <br /> officials want to see..." can't alter the building to be less safe or less sanitary than the current building. If the current <br /> level of safety or sanitation is reduced, it may not be reduced to that below Chapters 2-12 and 14-33 of the IBC. Note <br /> that we never get here unless the designer opts for the Performance Compliance Method. <br /> Bottom Line: Since the occupant load for the mercantile space is greater than 100,separate facilities are still required <br /> for men and women. Since separate facilities exist,they need to continue to be provided,or they need to be replaced <br /> with new meeting the current requirements. Accessibility Code 1341,section 1112.8.3 requires that if the existing <br /> restrooms remain,they must be upgraded to provide wheelchair accessible stalls in both the men's and the women's <br /> restrooms. If this is technically infeasible,then a separate accessible unisex toilet may be added. If the new tenant <br /> opts to demolish the existing facilities and provide new,separate accessible toilets will be required for both genders. <br /> Greg Metz � Construction Code Rep � Architect <br /> MN- DLI Construction Codes& Licensing Division <br /> From: Roger Peitso [mailto:rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:36 PM <br /> To: Metz, Greg (DLI) <br /> Cc: Jeremy Barnhart <br /> Subject: Plan Review <br /> G reg, <br /> Here is a copy of the plans I was given. The architect didn't sign them and there was quite a few problems with the <br /> clearances at the doors so I have a review letter into him. Also this is technically a basement, there is a story above this <br /> that empties onto the street level. Any questions please give me a call. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Roger Peitso <br /> Building Official <br /> 3 <br />