Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:55 AM <br /> To: 'Rodger.Skare@Grubb-Ellis.com' <br /> Cc: Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: FW: 2090 Shoreline Drive <br /> Attachments: Sketch -2090 Shoreline.pdf <br /> Rodger— <br /> In past practice the City has not considered the Flood Fringe areas of Lake Minnetonka (i.e. the area between the 929.4' <br /> and 931.5' contours)as unbuildable land for lot area calculation purposes, as long as that area is not wetland. We have <br /> allowed any number of teardown/rebuilds on existing developed properties in which a significant portion of the <br /> property outside the footprint of the residence was below 931.5'. I penciled in the 75' setback and the 931.5' contour <br /> on your submitted survey,and that suggests there is an area of approximately 10,000 s.f. (60-80' deep and 120-140' <br /> wide) meeting the 75' setback and above the 931.5' contour(hashed area of the sketch). I believe that a replacement <br /> for the home on that high ground would be allowed. I doubt that a second building site is feasible, however,given the <br /> limited land area available above the 931.5' contour. Any filling to create a building pad in the areas below 931.5' would <br /> likely have to be mitigated by creating equal or greater volumes of flood storage area by excavating land in portions of <br /> the site that that are above 931.5'—probably not feasible on this property. <br /> Mike <br /> Michael P.Gaffron <br /> Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy <br /> City of Orono <br /> (Street Address)2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> (Mailing Address) P.O.Box 66,Crystal Bay,MN 55323 <br /> Phone:(952)249-4600 <br /> Fax: (952)249-4616 <br /> From: Christine Mattson <br /> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:11 AM <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Subject: FW: 2090 Shoreline Drive <br /> Mike, <br /> Will you respond to his email/question? <br /> Thanks! <br /> From: Skare, Rodger�mailto:Rodcler.SkareCc�Grubb-Ellis.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:13 AM <br /> To: Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: RE: 2090 Shoreline Drive <br /> Christine, <br /> These notes are very helpful for considering the property"as improved". But as I mentioned the other day, I also need <br /> to do an analysis of the property"as vacant" (meaning as an unimproved or undeveloped site, assuming there are no <br /> i <br />