Laserfiche WebLink
;'`� <br /> '''''; <br /> ;�. <br /> i <br /> • : <br /> � <br /> o:totto COt1NCIL t�ETZp6 HEI.D !�s7�AC8 8, 15'76 Paqe 2 � <br /> Sea.lea moved, Su,ler •ecanded., �o adopt � RESGLUTION 4664 ; <br /> z�aalution �664, A R�solntion Apptavinq Hart�rood 8ubdivisioa � <br /> Tha It�+rtaood Subdiviaion by Lwis Sc�att � � <br /> for 2060 Shoreline Drivc, ottectiws t�pon `: <br /> �uL�lic�tion t3arch 18, 2976. N�t�ou, � . ,r � <br /> Ayee (4) - N�ys (4) . ;:; <br /> ::� <br /> ��. <br /> 4." <br /> Itr_nry Etuhfch, Duilding i Zoninq l�ninistrator, SUADZVIS20� i STREL•"P �� <br /> �tr+tecl tha. 1tr. �uentir� �o;::�sonN 3535 Zvy VACATION r` <br /> Plbce, owns Lots 72,75,7b and part o� Lot 77. 3535 Ivy Place �* <br /> tlr. Doubledee recently purchased Lots 73 � �4 �� <br /> anc] applfed for building permits on the two �� <br /> aubatandarcl lota. I expininecl the �ituation �; <br /> to tlie applicant ao he hae mad� an aqrmeioent �� <br /> `►`'Y <br /> with t[r. Johnson to purchaes psrt of Lot 75 <br /> ancl include this in a newly proposed plat �;'a <br /> along with the alley which they are also � ; <br /> requesting be vacstecl. � <br /> �,: <br /> Parcel 1 would be 94' wide anc� consist o� 0.40 = <br /> Acres and Parcel 2 would excead 100 ft. width �'�� <br /> and consist of 0.49 acres. Td1ie area is � <br /> zoned LR-1C (1/2 acre - 10� ft. lot �►idth) . r,; <br /> �pproval of this subdivision wauld include � <br /> the followinq variances: �'� <br /> Parcel 1 - 0.1 acre area an�i G !t. lot width �'£ <br /> Parcel 2 - 0.01 acre area only �:; <br /> F� <br /> l�n►�roval of the vacation of the alley would § <br /> also be necessary. Th3 Planning Commieaion � <br /> sliould schedule a public h�aring regardinc� � � <br /> this subdivieion and vncetion proposal. "' <br /> .,u <br /> Planning Commisaion tieeting - January 19, 1976 <br /> The Cammission scheduled a public hearinc� for <br /> 7:30 P.t�i. on TuesdAy, February 17, 1976. <br /> Tlie Planr�ing Comr.�ission agreed tho proposecl <br /> alley vacation woulcl be no benefit to the - <br /> general public but crould defini�ely increase j�;' ; <br /> the values of the subject rroperties. They <br /> rec�uested the Zoninc� Administrator to consult �` <br /> witli the asseasor to determine the benefit �' <br /> tliat would result from this vacation. �`:; <br /> Planning Commission Iteeting - I'ebruary 17, 197G ; <br /> »��r.r�u!3r, t�f' .th.r. ex�ent c�f ��:.>jact.ic��� �C t;hr. ����hlic <br /> het�ring, th�! Planninq i:ommisz�i�n cQntint�ed the <br /> E�ublic hearing unti.l the rriretinc; c�f: Ii��rch 1, 197G _ <br /> tor time for �ddition��� r�v.ic« of tlyE� ��ro��o��11. (Continuc�ri) <br /> , _ <br /> ; . . . �r.� :,� ;-;,a .�. � �_,, ��,. _.. . _.._ .. <br /> ��` ' r• . <br />