Laserfiche WebLink
° ` � MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br /> . MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1997 <br /> • (#5 -#2264 Janet Kieman- Continued) � � <br /> . Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded,to reopen Application#2264. Vote: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded,to amend Resolution#3946 to reflect that.any � <br /> . � . � previous variances given to the structure in the 0-75' setback would be totally.eliminated <br /> and the amount of square footage would be credited to the 7�-2�0' setback. All <br /> remaining variances would remain as in the original resolution. The side setback is not <br /> . to exceed amount stated. <br /> � The applicant supported this motion. � <br /> Dzurik asked if structure changes are made on the blueprint, if the applicant has to pay a � <br /> fee. Gaffron said the building inspector would likely have to charge another plan review <br /> which is typically a percentage and would be for probably a couple of hours time. � <br /> Jabbour asked if this fee could be waived. Barrett said it could. This was not added to ��: <br /> the motion but with Council a?reement and understanding by staff: <br /> Vote: Ayes 5,Nays 0. � <br /> (Agenda order continues after review of Item#17) <br /> • �. (#1�BURNING PERMIT REGULATIONS � � . <br /> Gappa reported that the Council has reviewed the buming permit regulations in the past. <br /> The recent changes for consideration include changes to the length of the permit and an <br /> allowance for burning of brush depending on the lot size. The buming regulations in <br /> Independence and Minnetrista were researched,where they allow brush to be burned <br /> �vithout permit up to a 25'pile, 10'high. Gappa said development in Orono was then <br /> � reviewed and burning was considered for three categories: recreational, small brush, and <br /> large brush. Gappa reviewed the requirements for each type of burning as outlined in <br /> the packet. <br /> Gappa said he spoke with West Hennepin Public Safety,who requires a water supply . <br /> consisting of a single hose.for a small brush fire that includes log disposal. .He thought <br /> their requirements were reasonable. The large brush fires would be for properties of 5+ <br /> acres. In that case,the West Hennepin Public Safety requires two hoses. � <br /> Jabbour asked for public comments. � <br /> Allan Engleman, 315 Old Crystal Bay Road,asked if the Council was now considering <br /> burning of brush. He�vas informed that this�vas beina considered. <br /> i � <br /> 21 � <br />