Laserfiche WebLink
� s �S �- �'cn�a� r�c.sol�h an Gv rrv'h`J y. <br /> � ��� � <br /> ��—' u� e��� an �- P'��'� �'Pn {� <br /> . , <br /> /r� o�\\\\ V!'u� D f 200/. '�5 lJ 3 V�6 <br /> � � , J <br /> � ciT� o� oRo�o <br /> , <br /> a � <br /> � � / <br /> � � RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY COUNCIL <br /> \�� G~;%� . <br /> ��9k �4°�'%' N O. � ;�i exti <br /> ESH ri - <br /> ���i �! 1�SCLUTIOrJ G�i'+1TING VARI-A� <br /> TO A�IUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.55, S�JBDIVISIOl°�1 16 (C) (2), SECTI�N i�.22, <br /> SUBDIVISION 1(B) <br /> FYLE NO. #01-267�1 . <br /> '4VH�REAS. L�ennis Killian and Diane ICiilian (hereinafter "the applicants"; are <br /> a���ne;r� of fhe property located at 1420 Shoreline Drive within the rity o.f Orona (hereir�after <br /> "the City") and ie�ally desc�ibed as fc�llows: <br /> Lat 2, Block i, Dra�onf!}� Hill, Hennepin County, Mir.nesota (hereinafter <br /> "property"); �nd <br /> ��JI-i��EAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with <br /> I��.Cin:-!esota Stattites and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Cocles, the Orono Planning <br /> Curui��issi��z l�eld a public hearing on May 21, 200i at �vhich times all persons desii�ng to be <br /> heard concernin� this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and <br /> �VI�EIZLA.S, the applicants ilave applied to the City for rene�val of a variance <br /> �o Mun;cipal "LotZi�Zg Code Section 10.56, Su�division 16 (C) (2) to permit construction of a <br /> ne�v residence un the lot encr�aching 20' into the top of bluff setback; and <br /> NOW, �'I��ItEI'�Y2E, BE IT RESOLVEI) by the City Cotmcil of Orono, <br /> i�1i;u:esota: <br /> FiNDINGS ' <br /> 1. lhis application �vas reviewed as Zonin� File #01-2674. <br /> 2. Appiication rene�vs the variance as approved by the Council on September 27, <br /> 1999, Zoning Application #2516. <br /> ;. The property is located in the LR-lA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District. <br /> 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 21, 2001 and <br /> recommended approval �n a vote of 4 to 0 to renew va:iances for bluff setback <br /> based upon the following findings: <br /> � Page 1 of 5 <br />