Laserfiche WebLink
• ' Page 1 of 3 <br /> Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:37 PM <br /> To: 'Richard Brown' <br /> Cc: Soren Mattick; Scott Oberaigner <br /> Subject: RE: 1300 Shoreline Drive Gate Request <br /> Richard — <br /> First of all, I don't specifically recall our supposed conversation some years ago in which I "promised"that the City <br /> would not make changes to your driveway. I don't doubt that I may have made a statement to the effect that iYs <br /> not likely that the City would extend Fox Street given the topographic issues. However, I have no recollection of <br /> suggesting that the history of problems with your house construction would have any impact on the City's future <br /> decisions on use of the public right of way. <br /> Last week I acknowledged recalling that you wanted some assurance in writing that the City was not going to <br /> suddenly take away your driveway and that it can stay where it is. In fact, the City granted you variances in 2003 <br /> knowing full well that you have two driveways and a parking area that rely on use of the public right-of-way. Most <br /> residential properties make use of some part of the public right-of-way for access. Your access within the right-of- <br /> way is no different than others, other than it is particularly distant from an improved traveled road, hence its <br /> existing reasonable configuration. <br /> I can tell you that the City currently has no plans and no intent to eliminate your driveway in the right-of-way. The <br /> City has no plans to extend Fox Street easterly from its terminus west of you, given the topographic challenges <br /> and the lack of a current need for such extension. I cannot, however, "promise"you that the City will never <br /> change the access to your property. There are probably circumstances under which such a change might be <br /> warranted; for instance, if the Rail Authority were to successfully deny access across their right-of-way. That <br /> does not appear to be the case. <br /> I've never had the authority to make a promise that binds the City to limit its use of the public right-of-way. From <br /> my perspective, I cannot make the City's position regarding your driveway any clearer. Consider this email as my <br /> response to your request for written confirmation of the City's intent. <br /> Michael P.Gaffron <br /> Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy <br /> City of Orono <br /> (Street Address)2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> (Mailing Address)P.O. Box 66,Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br /> Phone: (952)249-4600 <br /> Fax: (952)249-4616 <br /> From: Richard Brown [mailto:Richard.Brown@jnba.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:03 PM <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Subject: RE: 1300 Shoreline Drive Gate Request <br /> Mike <br /> Thanks for the email. I am obviously disappointed about the gate issue, but as a reasonable person I will walk <br /> away from the project. It makes no sense to ruin the visual appearance and functionality of my property by placing <br /> the gate where you are recommending. We will have to continue to tolerate the unwelcome turnaround traffic we <br /> get regularly. I will accept the offer made to me by public works to install a private drive sign. <br /> In reference to your last paragraph, that information does not comply with what you originally promised me. And, <br /> when I was in your office last week you acknowledged you had not put in writing for me as you said you would <br /> 4/7/2008 <br />