My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5868
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5800 - 5899 (June 22, 2009 - January 11, 2010)
>
Resolution 5868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2018 1:23:59 PM
Creation date
10/25/2018 1:23:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� o� <br /> 0 0 <br /> � CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� �� � <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L <br /> ��`�kEsKo�`'�G rvo. � R h g <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on <br /> September 21, 2009 and recommended approval of variances based on the <br /> following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 53,400 in area and has 147' in width at the OHWL and <br /> 140' in width at the 75' setback. <br /> b. The lot is substandard in area and width and a residence has existed on the <br /> property for many years. <br /> c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into <br /> conformity. <br /> d. The proposed addition will be almost entirely over an existing pool patio, and <br /> the hardcover variance as requested will result in only a minor increase in <br /> hardcover; 30 s.f. <br /> e. The existing residence with tlie proposed addition at 7% will be below the <br /> structural lot coverage limitation of 15%. <br /> f. The encroachment into the average lakeshore setback will not negatively <br /> impact views enjoyed by the most affected property owner due to topographic <br /> changes and vegetation. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable <br /> hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br /> and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.