My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
10-15-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:33 PM
Creation date
10/18/2018 3:01:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,September 17,2018 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart stated the goal is to reduce the need for variances,but that the Planning Commission should <br /> recognize that some new nonconformities will likely be introduced due to the changes. Barnhart stated <br /> there are some areas where the setbacks have been increased but generally they have been kept the same. <br /> Barnhart stated while the goal is to reduce the need for variances, it will not completely eliminate them. <br /> Thiesse asked how the Planning Commission feels about Item No. 5. <br /> Curtis stated her suggestion would be to delete the existing language. The list of private recreational <br /> facilities includes things that are affixed or not affixed,such as a portable basketball hoop or a fire pit. <br /> Staff feels relatively confident that most of those things can be covered by considering it an accessory <br /> structure. <br /> Libby asked why they don't just call it a private recreational accessory structure to keep it separated from <br /> more of a storage related structure. <br /> Curtis indicated the definition of accessory structure is anything that is built, constructed, erected, etc., <br /> like a hot tub or sport court or patio, but is not a building. <br /> Barnhart stated he sees private recreational facilities as not adding a lot of value because it is an accessory <br /> structure. <br /> Thiesse suggested they delete private recreational facilities and leave it as an accessory structure. <br /> Curtis indicated she will have some language and tables to review at the next meeting. <br /> Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:58 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments related to this application. <br /> Chair Thiesse continued the public hearing to the October Planning Commission meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.