Laserfiche WebLink
wetland areas on the south portion of the pr,operty are mapped as Udorthents. These soiis are associated with cut <br /> and fill areas that were graded at some time in the past. <br /> Table 1—Summary of Soils <br /> Map Soil Name Hydric Class <br /> Symbol <br /> L22E Lester loam,morainic,18 to 25 rcent slo es Partiall h dric <br /> Urban land-ildorthents(cut and fill land) <br /> U6B com lex,0 to 6 rcent slo es Unknown <br /> L37B An us loam,morainic,2 to 5 rcent slo es Partiall h dric <br /> Houghton anQl Muskego soils,depressional,0 <br /> L50A to 1 ercent slo es All h dric <br /> Muskego,Blule Earth,and Houghton soils, <br /> L16A onded,0 to 1 rcent slo s All h dric <br /> L376 An us loam, orainic,2 to 5 ercent slo es Partiall h dric � <br /> Lester loam,morainic,6 to 12 percent slopes, <br /> L22C2 eroded Partiall h dric <br /> Udorthents,wet substratum,0 to 2 percent <br /> U2A slo es Unknown <br /> Hydrology <br /> Drainage on the property is generally to the east to a large wetland basin that connects to Lafayette Bay,Lake <br /> Minnetonka. A small wetland basin is located within a drainageway that extends northeast through the south part of <br /> the property. This wetland basin,which rec�ives stormwater runoff from Shadywood Road and possibly from areas <br /> southwest of Shadywood Road,may have been created to treat local stormwater. Whether this area was historically <br /> wetland is unknown and would require furtHer review. Hydrology within the large wetland complex that extends <br /> along the north and east boundary of the property is a combination of surface water runoff and high water tables <br /> reflecting local ground water mnditions. <br /> Antecedent Precipitation and Climatic Cond�tions <br /> The multi-month score for the prior three mo�ths gridded precipitation database at Spring Park,Minnesota was not <br /> available due to the late date of the delineation. The most recent months that precipitation is available(August and <br /> September,2014),are ranked as normal and c�ry,respectively. This data is consistent with soil moisture and water <br /> table levels observed during the field survey,jwhen conditions appeared to be dry. <br /> 3.0 METHODOLOGY ' <br /> The methodology of the 1987 Army Corps of�ngineer Wetland Delineation Manual and Regional Supplement for the <br /> Midwest Region were used to delineate wetl ds on the property.In advance of field survey work,a desktop review <br /> of available data(see Figures 2 and 3)was co�pleted to identify potential wetiand areas. <br /> T'he desktop review utilized U.S.Fish and Wildiife Service National Wetland Inventory data,Natural Resources <br /> Conservation Service soil survey data,LiDAI�2-foot topographic contours and 2013 aerial imagery.T'he entire survey <br /> area was then walked,with all potential wetl�nd areas inspected.Where wetlands were determined to exist,a <br /> wetland and upland observation point was ta�cen along a transect perpendicular to the wetland/upland boundary. <br /> Freshwater Foundation 'i Pape 3 Wetland Delineation Reaort <br /> Cross River Consulting, LLC June 3, 2015 <br />