Laserfiche WebLink
�, � <br /> �O� . <br /> � �� � ONO <br /> � � CITY of UR <br /> � <br /> ti <br /> �',� G'� . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L`9kESI3�4��' NO. � 1 3 � <br /> b. The existing house andproposed 400 s.f.gara�e will coilstitute 1490 s.f.of lot <br /> coverage by structures,just tulder the 1500 s.f.lot coverage allotment for lots less <br /> than 10,000 s.f. in area. <br /> c. Tlie corifiguration ofthe existing house and proposed side-loading garage will <br /> mulunize hardcover while still allowuig for off-sh eet velucle parldng in fiont ofthe <br /> garage. The side setback variance of 5'to the iioith lot line will allow for adequate <br /> parking area and bacicup aproii on tlus nanow lot wlule lzaving no negative impact <br /> on neighboring pro�erties.The street setback vai-iance to allow a street setback <br /> of 9.8'where a 10'setback is iionnallyrequired will have no negative impacts on <br /> the neighborhood. ' <br /> d: A small first-floor level deck of no greater than 100 s.f.slzould be allowed on <br /> tlie southeast lake side of tlle house to serve the two existing doorways at that <br /> comer. However,such deck,landings and steps to grade should be located so <br /> • as to minimize the additional encroaclunent of hardcover a.nd structure in the <br /> 0-75' setback zone. <br /> e. The small lot size and the proximity to Coffee Channel are hardships in that <br /> approximately 3/4 of the area of this developed lot is within 75'of the shoreline. <br /> The 25%75-250'hardcover allotrnent would allow only 43 8 s.f.o f hardcover on <br /> tlle site,which would not allow for the minimal existing house, garage, and <br /> driveways and sidewalks necessaryto maultain a residence on the site without <br /> variances. <br /> 4. .The City Council llas considered this application,including the recominendations and <br /> findings of the Planning Commission,reports by City staff,corrnnents by the applicant and <br /> the public,and the effect of the proposed variances on the health,safety a�id welfare ofthe <br /> community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do <br /> not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the variances <br /> would not adversely affect traffic conditions,light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other <br /> danger to neighboring properiy;would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br /> but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty;is necessary to preserve <br /> a substantial propertyright of the applicant;and would be in keeping withthe spirit and <br /> • intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> � 4 <br />