My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#2921 - variances-1991
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Shadywood Road
>
1690 Shadywood Rd - 17-117-23-21-0017
>
Resolutions
>
#2921 - variances-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:32:03 PM
Creation date
9/6/2018 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1690
Street Name
Shadywood
Street Type
Road
Address
1690 Shadywood Road
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
1711723210017
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cit� o� oR,oNo <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L <br /> � NO. 2921 <br /> • - • • <br /> 1) Lakeshore setback: <br /> Required = 75 ' <br /> Existing PrinciFal Structure = 55 ' <br /> Existing Accessnry Structure = 10 ' <br /> ProFosed Principal Structure = 61' <br /> ProFcsed Accessory Structure = 59 ' fsecond level deck <br /> extends 2 ' beyond lakefront of principal <br /> residence) <br /> Variance: <br /> " Existing Principal Structure = 20 ' or 26$ <br /> ProFcsed Principal Structure = 14 ' or 18 . 6$ <br /> Existing Accessory Structure = 65 ' or 86� <br /> ProFosed Accessory Structure = 16 ' or 21$ (second story <br /> ugper level deck) <br /> 2 ) Hardcaver within the 0-75 ' Setback Area: <br /> Allowed = 0 s.f. <br /> Existing = 926 s.f. or 15.8� <br /> ProFosed = 812 s.f. or 13 .5$ <br /> Total Reduction = 2.5� <br /> B) The apFlication involves no need for a hardcover variance <br /> within the 75-250' setback area as app licant groposes removal of <br /> major portions of existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback <br /> area. <br /> C) The use of the existing foundation will provide less of an <br /> impact on the lakeshore proFerty. <br /> D) The ariginal structure was placed on the property prior to <br /> current standards for lakeshore develapment. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this aFplicatian including the <br /> findings and recommendations of the Planning Commissicn, reForts by <br /> City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br /> variances on the health, safety and we lfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> progerty are geculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br /> FroFerty in this zoninq district; that granting the variances would <br /> nct adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboriag property; would not merely serve <br /> as a convenience to the app licant, but is necessary to al leviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br /> substantial property right of the app licant; and would be i� keeFing <br /> with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br /> of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.