Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,August 13,2018 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 14. LMCD—Continued <br /> Anderson stated the next pictures show his area being weed free,then the harvester going right off the end <br /> of the docks,and several pictures showing the weeds that were left. Anderson noted they all paid for <br /> chemical treatment but none of them received a call before the harvester came. <br /> Anderson stated the LMCD is also talking about raising the marina rates. In addition,the proposed 2019 <br /> LMCD budget for next year shows Orono paying$58,275.00,which is a 3.7 percent increase, and <br /> includes$80,000 of make work money. Anderson asked when the bleeding is going to stop. <br /> Walsh asked how much the residents raised for chemical treatment in his area. <br /> Anderson indicated it was$1,000 a piece with around 30 people participating out of 60. <br /> Walsh stated the cost for chemical treatment should decrease each year and actually eliminates the weeds. <br /> Walsh stated Orono would like to continue this discussion with the LMCD at some point. <br /> The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT—DENNIS LIBBY,REPRESENTATIVE <br /> 11. LA18-000063—MATT JOHNSON, 1432 SHORELINE DRIVE,VARIANCE- <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 6891 <br /> Printup stated he is fine with the project but that he would like to make one comment. Printup noted the <br /> property next door is a successful business and a high traffic area. Printup asked whether the Council is <br /> agreeable to allowing the fence to go up to eight feet. <br /> Walsh commented this is a very unique situation and that he would like to hear from the applicant on <br /> whether he is interested in going up to eight feet. <br /> Matt Johnson, 1432 Shoreline Drive, stated the Planning Commission also brought up the eight feet and <br /> that he would like that option but that he also wants the fence to feel right. Johnson stated in his view <br /> some portions would justify the increase in height and that it would be logistically easier to have the <br /> option now. <br /> Walsh stated he would be agreeable to allowing the fence to be up to eight feet. <br /> Dankey asked whether it would impede the view at all. <br /> Printup stated there is a row of very tall trees, a house,and on the other side there is a deck,which is an <br /> after the fact item. Printup stated in his view it protects everybody going up two more feet and that he <br /> does not see any safety issues since the fence is in between the two properties and is not on the road side. <br /> Dankey asked how far back from the road the fence would start. <br /> Matt Johnson indicated it would be 12 to 15 feet. <br /> Walsh stated he does not believe there would be any sightline problems. <br /> Page 11 of 14 <br />