My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
05-21-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 1:24:50 PM
Creation date
8/23/2018 4:22:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, April 16, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />The City's consulting engineer has provided a detailed review and comments on the plan. The developer <br />should address all applicable comments prior to placement on the City Council's agenda. In addition, the <br />developer should comply with the permitting requirements from the MCWD and Hennepin County as <br />necessary. <br />To date, no additional public comments have been received. <br />Staff recommends approval of the master development plan, approval of rezoning to RPUD, and final plat <br />conditioned upon compliance with the requirements of the City's consulting engineer and permitting <br />requirements of the other regulatory agencies. <br />Thiesse noted in a comment received from the Metropolitan Council in regard to the 2040 Comprehensive <br />Plan Update, they state the City should note that the minimum density of land guided to address this is <br />eight units per acre. Thiesse asked what that relates to. <br />Barnhart stated the Metropolitan Council establishes certain goals, such as work force housing goals, and <br />that the Metropolitan Council looks at those areas that are guided for eight units per acre as meeting those <br />goals. The Metropolitan Council does not identify specific locations within the City for that type of <br />housing. Barnhart noted when the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was developed, the range was six units or <br />more. <br />Landgraver noted that is a 33 percent increase. <br />Thiesse asked whether the 33 comments of the engineer are requirements or whether they are simply <br />desired amenities. <br />Curtis indicated some of them are requirements. <br />Thiesse asked if the grinder pump is a requirement. <br />Curtis indicated she does not know the answer to that at this time but that the motion by the Planning <br />Commission should be conditioned upon the comments of the engineer. <br />Landgraver asked if there was some discussion previously about the stormwater pond needing to be <br />modified. <br />Thiesse noted that was included in the engineer's comments. <br />Sanjeev Mangalick, Apex Holding, stated they did receive a list of the engineer's comments and that their <br />engineer is here and he can answer any specific questions. Mangalick indicated he did speak with the <br />contractor and they do not have any issues with any of the recommendations. Mangalick stated they will <br />make sure they comply to the City's needs and requirements. As it relates to the pond, additional <br />engineering is needed but that it will be designed accordingly. <br />Ryan Bloom, Westwood Engineering, stated they were able to get the existing calculations for the <br />stormwater pond. The pond was designed in 2002 to handle this development as well as one other <br />development but that since that time some of the regulations have changed. Bloom indicated they will <br />need to add some additional equipment if the pond is utilized, but that they will likely handle the water on <br />Page 5 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.