Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 25,2018 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 13. LA18-42—TEXT AMENDMENT: CHAPTERS 78 AND 82 PUBLIC HEARING <br /> NOTIFICATION DISTANCE AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDINANCE NO.210,THIRD SERIES—Continued <br /> Printup commented the ordinance fits in with what the City Council has talked about with communication <br /> with the residents and that he is in favor of the ordinance,especially when something controversial is <br /> going on in the area. Printup stated it is another tool the City can say that they are trying to let people <br /> know what is going on. <br /> Crosby indicated he concurs with Council Member Printup but that the Council and Planning <br /> Commission will need to weigh the comments. <br /> Dankey noted the ordinance would also result in more cost to the applicants. <br /> Barnhart stated the fee has been adjusted so the City absorbs those costs and that it would be nominal. <br /> Mayor Walsh asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on this item. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Printup moved,Seals seconded,to adopt ORDINANCE NO.210,Third Series,an Ordinance <br /> Amending Title IV Land Use Pertaining to Public Hearing Notification Distances,and to approve <br /> the summary ordinance,SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO.211,Third Series. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays <br /> 0. <br /> 14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY,2709 WALTERS <br /> PORT LANE,SKETCH PLAN <br /> Paul Vogstrom,Applicant,was present. <br /> Curtis stated the owners are requesting input on a sketch plan proposing to create a new lakeshore lot <br /> between their Walters Port home and the Hueler property at 2715 Pence. Because the property as it exists <br /> today results from the recent combination of 2709 Walters Port Land and the recently acquired 2710 <br /> Pence Lane property,a subdivision rather than a lot line rearrangement is necessary. <br /> This application was discussed last week at the Planning Commission meeting. As proposed,there are a <br /> number of unresolved issues,some of which result in nonconformities and the need for variances. The <br /> following is a summary of the issues: <br /> A. The existing private driveway is conforming as it serves only two homes. The addition of a third <br /> lotJhome served triggers the Code requirement for a 24-foot wide,private road within a platted <br /> 50-foot outlot,with a 100-foot cul-de-sac. The applicant is showing a private driveway with two <br /> gates and an emergency access connection to Walters Port Lane for police,fire,and ambulance <br /> access. This driveway does not meet Code standards to add a third lot. <br /> B. Without creation of a platted outlot for a private road,proposed Lot 2 will be a second back lot, <br /> where the Code allows for a maximum of one lot to be a back lot. In addition,Lot 2 as shown <br /> Page 3 of 21 <br />