RE: settlement for pumping station installed

Home Browse Search

if a settlement could not be reached. 6. The pumping station was� not put in the Northeast corfier of the lot as promised, but was 31 feet from the corner stake of the lot. The station is 28 inches high instead of flush with the ground. Instead of putting the power pole on the lot line, it was placed 13 feet into the lot. A number of small trees were damaged and the parking area was not resurfaced with gravel . When Robert Mann was ad�ised of the �above errors he agreed that the installation was wrong but stated that there was nothing he could do about it. 7. At a June 14, 1971 public hearing before the Village Counci:l, Mr. Bredeson explained to the Village Council that the pumping station was not installed as promised and left a photo- graph with the President of the Council showing that the station protrudes 28 inches above the ground level. 8. On June 16, 1971 Mr. Bredeson'a lawyers sent a letter to the Village Attorney requesting that l�ir. Bredeson be contacted regarding a settlement for the pumping station. No reply has been received. _ .. _ ... . , 9 . Ori June. 30, 1971 Mr. Bredeson's lawyers. sent another letter to the Village Attorney informing him that the installation did not conform to the specifications promised and asking that the �situation be corrected. No reply has been received. 10 . On August 10, 1971 a construction crew appeared on the property to commence sodding without discussing this or re- ceiving any approval from Mr. Bredeson. 11. On August 11, 1971 P+Ir. Bredeson's attorneys requested William Mills to cease work on the Bredeson property until a meeting would be arranged. On the afternoon of August 12, 1971 Mr. Bredeson, Mr. Mills, and Mr. Bredeson's attorney, Warren Mack, met at the property to discuss the problem... Robert Mann did not attend. 12. At the August llth meeting Mr. Mills agreed th- �he - 2 -