My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#4866-variance-2002
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
R
>
Railroad Avenue
>
1360 Railroad Avenue - 10-117-23-31-0007
>
Resolutions
>
#4866-variance-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:22:29 PM
Creation date
7/11/2018 12:47:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1360
Street Name
Railroad
Street Type
Avenue
Address
1360 Railroad Avenue
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
1011723310007
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 � <br /> I O� <br /> O � , <br /> ,� .�.. � <br /> CITY of ORONU. <br /> ti <br /> ��� �G�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �kES�I04�' NO. 4 � G � <br /> rec�uired lot area. The property consists of approximately.51 acres. <br /> 3. The O�ono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 16,2002 and <br /> recom�nended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. <br /> � <br /> 4. The Paanning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing to 2,360 s.f.(10.6%) well <br /> below the allowed 15%. - <br /> B. The hardship is the existing house location in relation to the front lot line. <br /> C. The hardcover in the 500-1000' setback zone is well below the allowed 35%. <br /> D. The existing residence was built in the early 1960's,prior to current zoning <br /> standards. <br /> E. The front covered porch is in character with the neighborhood. <br /> F. The only neighbor potentially impacted by the covered porch wrote a letter of <br /> support. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or'other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> ne�cessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> kaeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> ��elfare of the community. <br /> 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.